{"id":687,"date":"2016-05-26T15:39:34","date_gmt":"2016-05-26T15:39:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/?p=238"},"modified":"2023-10-11T04:43:20","modified_gmt":"2023-10-11T09:43:20","slug":"frinvblog-the-grammar-and-use-of-initialisms-by-the-u-s-federal-government","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/frinvblog-the-grammar-and-use-of-initialisms-by-the-u-s-federal-government\/","title":{"rendered":"The Grammar and Use of Initialisms by the U.S. Federal Government"},"content":{"rendered":"
This research on the use of initialisms by the United States federal government was produced during our publication of a paper<\/a> in the Springer journal, Science and Engineering Ethics. The editor of that journal thought it would be worth publishing this information separately, for the benefit of others. We agreed; the following summarizes what we learned:<\/h5>\n
1. The definite article, “the”, should generally precede initialisms – but that is often not the case for the initialisms of U.S. government agency names
\n<\/em><\/h5>\n
As previously noted by John McIntyre, an editor at the Baltimore Sun newspaper:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201cAn initialism<\/em><\/strong> uses the first letters of the words being abbreviated and is pronounced letter by letter rather than as a word*: FBI, mph<\/em>. An acronym<\/em><\/strong> combines first letters or compounds of the constituent words into an abbreviation that is pronounced as a word: NASA, scuba<\/em>. If it\u2019s not pronounced as a word, it\u2019s not an acronym.\u201d (http:\/\/www.baltimoresun.com\/bs-mtblog-2008-12-abbreviations_initialisms_and_acronyms-story.html)<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
*[In this basic meaning, a \u201cword\u201d is a spoken sound or its written representation.]<\/h5>\n
Then, getting to the point at hand, McIntyre continues:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201cThe definite article is used before abbreviations of agencies \u2014 the FBI, the CIA <\/em>\u2014 and nations \u2014 the U.S., the U.K. <\/em>\u2014 but not before the abbreviations of universities\u2019 names. Devoutly as some might wish, Ohio State University is not called the OSU<\/em>. Some bureaucrats indulge in omitting the article before the names of their agencies<\/strong>, because they are very important people, pressed for time on the nation\u2019s business and too urgently focused on the public weal to trifle with the definite article. For them, it\u2019s OMB says <\/em>and EPA reports<\/em>. But if you were interested in mimicking pomposity, you wouldn\u2019t be reading this.\u201d [With bold emphasis added.]<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
However, as we noted in our article, both the federal Office of Research Integrity, ORI, and the laws referring to it, often do not use \u201cthe\u201d preceding ORI.<\/h5>\n
For example, although its formal webpage header and caption do state \u201cThe ORI\u201d, much of the rest of the ORI\u2019s website does not continue the use of the definite article before the agency name:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201cAbout ORI<\/strong><\/h5>\n
The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) oversees and directs Public Health Service (PHS) research integrity activities on behalf of the Secretary of Health and Human Services with the exception of the regulatory research integrity activities of the Food and Drug Administration.<\/h5>\n
Organizationally, ORI<\/strong> is located within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH) within Office of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (OS) in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).\u201d<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Also, we reproduce here one of our many quotes of HHS regulations which also does not employ the definite article before ORI<\/strong>:<\/strong><\/h5>\n
\n
\u201c(c) Any authorized HHS component <\/em>may impose, administer, or enforce HHS administrative actions separately or in coordination with other HHS components, including, but not limited <\/strong>to ORI<\/strong>, the Office of Inspector General, the PHS funding component, and the debarring official<\/strong>.” <\/strong>(42 CFR \u00a7 93.407(c).\u00a0 <\/strong><\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
2. HHS style <\/em><\/h5>\n
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, HHS, is the home for many agencies involved with biomedical research and commerce, including the ORI, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). HHS has its own style guide (http:\/\/www.hhs.gov\/web\/policies-and-standards\/web-style-guide\/), as do other government agencies. HHS’s style guide seems to cite \u201cprominence\u201d of an agency, (perhaps a variant of \u201cpomposity\u201d), as a basis for the use of the definite article before initialisms is dropped. Specifically:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201cthe [HHS] Department’s style, which is based on the AP Stylebook<\/em><\/a>. Please consult this resource if you have questions. …<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
HHS Exceptions from AP style<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201cAgency Names <\/strong>and Use of the Word “The” \u2013<\/strong>Use “the” before the agency name (the Office of the Inspector General) if the agency commonly is known by that usage.<\/h5>\n
As for the abbreviations<\/strong>, it would be up to the agency to decide<\/strong> if the public would refer to the agency commonly by its initials and know what that means, and the name is being used as a noun (the FDA announced.) AP copy<\/strong> commonly uses “the” before FDA. That’s not the case for agencies less well-known, such as AHRQ<\/strong>.\u201d [AHRQ is the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.]<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
http:\/\/www.hhs.gov\/web\/policies-and-standards\/web-style-guide\/index.html<\/h5>\n
AHRQ does exactly that on its website:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201cWith the support of contracting staff, AHRQ maintains<\/strong> several additional subsites to fulfill our mission. A list of these sites and a link to the description of their focus is provided here.\u201d<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
However, even the FDA, which a U.S. layperson might consider a more well-known agency, uses their initialism without a preceding definite article:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201cThe scope of FDA\u2019s regulatory authority<\/strong> is very broad. FDA’s responsibilities are closely related to those of several other government agencies. Often frustrating and confusing for consumers is determining the appropriate regulatory agency to contact. The following is a list of traditionally-recognized product categories that fall under FDA\u2019s regulatory jurisdiction; however, this is not an exhaustive list.\u201d<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
In keeping with the HHS style guide(s), a former director of the ORI whom we quote, does not consistently use the definite article:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201c[Former ORI Director] <\/strong>Wright asked in his letter “whether OASH is the proper home for a regulatory office such as ORI<\/strong>, noting that [Assistant Secretary of Health\/ASH] Koh himself has described his office as an ‘<\/em>intensely political environment.’<\/em><\/strong> (The contents of the letter were published in Kaiser 2014).<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Even the Director of the NIH, in speaking to Congress, appears to use a mix of references to NIH with and without the definite article:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201cIt is an honor to appear before you today to present the Administration\u2019s fiscal year (FY) 2017 budget request for the NIH<\/strong>\u201d … \u201cAs the nation\u2019s premier biomedical research agency, NIH\u2019s mission<\/strong> is to seek fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems\u201d … \u201cNIH will <\/strong>pursue these and many other forward-looking measures\u201d. (https:\/\/www.nih.gov\/about-nih\/who-we-are\/nih-director\/testimony-fiscal-year-2017-budget-request-before-senate-committee)<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
NIH certainly would be considered a \u201cprominent\u201d agency, even outside the U.S. Consequently, we believe that the HHS Style Guide as stated in its Consumer Materials, has now become the predominant rule throughout HHS.<\/h5>\n
The HHS style guide rule quoted above can also be read as allowing each agency to decide its own usage. In order to learn more about what HHS policy on this point is, we contacted the HHS Media Information Office. They responded in writing as follows:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201c[E]ach agency does determine its own usage. In the case of ORI, we\u2019d encourage refraining from using \u201cthe\u201d.\u201d<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
So we are now fairly confident that HHS, its agency directors, its regulations, and its websites and publications, are all acting knowingly in not wishing to promote general use of the definite article before agency initialisms.<\/h5>\n
3. Our recommendation about the initialisms <\/em><\/h5>\n
Therefore, the question which arose with our editor was whether we should follow the HHS style guide (as we did in our initial submission), or should we attempt, by example, to \u201ccorrect\u201d the arguably “erroneous” grammatical usage being promoted by HHS and other U.S. agencies.<\/h5>\n
We believed that it might be less jarring to the readers to use HHS style throughout. This is because a significant part of the readership of our article, or any article discussing U.S. federal agencies and laws, would be expected to be those who are already used to this style, or who are members of the U.S. government, who are not only used to it, but even expecting it.<\/h5>\n
Therefore, we recommend keeping the HHS style for its initialisms.<\/h5>\n
For what it is worth, even the Chicago Manual of Style Online, which we consider in some ways superior to the AP Style Guide which HHS modifies, does not mandate use of the definite article before initialisms:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201c10.9\u201cA,\u201d \u201can,\u201d or \u201cthe\u201d preceding an abbreviation<\/h5>\n
When an abbreviation follows an indefinite article, the choice of a<\/em> or an<\/em> is determined by the way the abbreviation would be read aloud. Acronyms are read as words and are rarely preceded by a<\/em>, an<\/em>, or the<\/em> (\u201cmember nations of NATO\u201d), except when used adjectivally (\u201ca NATO initiative\u201d). Initialisms are read as a series of letters and are often<\/em><\/strong> preceded by an article (\u201cmember nations of the EU\u201d). See 10.2<\/a>; see also 7.44<\/a>.\u201d<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
4. Use of contiguous initialisms in the article <\/em><\/h5>\n
When we considered the treatment of compound initialisms like HHS OIG and NSF OIG, a question arose as to whether to indicate the possessive, or treat the contiguous intialisms as a single name: HHS OIG versus HHS\u2019 OIG, and NSF OIG rather than NSF\u2019s OIG. Generally, avoiding the apostrophe indicating possession appears to be the practice for both agencies. (OIG is the initialism for Office of the Inspector General.)<\/h5>\n
From the NSF OIG website:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201cRecent news articles have raised some concern about the security of the online complaint process used to report fraud, waste, and abuse to more than two dozen OIG hotlines, including NSF OIG. NSF OIG has swiftly addressed the issue …\u201d<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
From the HHS OIG website:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201cHHS OIG is the largest inspector general’s office in the Federal Government, with approximately 1,600 dedicated to combating fraud, waste and abuse and to improving the efficiency of HHS programs.\u201d<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Note that even the NIH at times does away with the possessive:<\/h5>\n
\n
\u201cNIH leadership<\/a> plays an active role in shaping the agency’s research planning<\/a>, activities, and outlook.\u201d (https:\/\/www.nih.gov\/about-nih\/who-we-are\/organization).<\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Therefore, as noted above for the use of the definite article before single agency initialisms like ORI, we recommend generally following the agency\u2019s use, except, for example, in cases in which distinction from other OIGs is desired.<\/h5>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This research on the use of initialisms by the United States federal government was produced during our publication of a paper in the Springer journal, Science and Engineering Ethics. The editor of that journal thought it would be worth publishing this information separately, for the benefit of others. We agreed; the following summarizes what we […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":617,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,15],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/687"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=687"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/687\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":708,"href":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/687\/revisions\/708"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/617"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amerares.com\/blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}